What a Wilderness Photographer Knows About Decision Making- Intro Series #4

There is a moment in wilderness photography that experienced photographers come to recognize and beginners almost universally mishandle. It's the moment just before the shot, when the animal is in the viewfinder, the light is close to right, and the elements are arranged nicely in the frame. Everything in you wants to press the shutter but the real shot is still a few seconds away.

I've been photographing wildlife long enough to understand this viscerally. The discipline of waiting, not passive waiting but active, alert, sustained attention in the absence of action, is one of the hardest things to develop and one of the most valuable. It is also, I've come to realize, almost exactly the discipline that separates good decision making from reactive decision making in leadership.

The patience and the decisiveness are the same practice. Both are expressions of being fully present to what is actually happening.

The field teaches three things that turn out to apply everywhere.

The wilderness teaches, first and most persistently, the cost of premature action. In photography the cost is obvious: you miss the peak of action and the shot is gone. In leadership the cost is less visible but equally real. The decision made before the situation was fully understood. The intervention launched before trust was built. The conclusion reached before the dissenting view was genuinely heard. These things happen constantly in organizations, and they leave wreckage in proportion to the authority behind them.

The pressure to act prematurely is enormous in most organizational contexts. Decisive leadership is celebrated; sustained inquiry looks like hesitation. There are quarterly targets and impatient stakeholders that seem to demand an answer now. And sometimes the answer is genuinely needed now. But more often the urgency is manufactured, a product of anxiety rather than actual constraint, and the cost of the premature decision is paid slowly over the months that follow, in ways that are hard to trace back to their origin.

Observation is its own kind of discipline.

The second thing the wilderness teaches is observation as a discipline in its own right. Most people don't look very well. They see what they expect to see, what fits the frame they've already built. What they miss is everything else: the light that turned extraordinary for forty-five seconds, the context that made the main subject meaningful. Leadership observation works the same way. The executive who enters a room with a thesis already formed is processing the meeting as confirmation or disconfirmation of what they already believe. Information that doesn't fit the thesis is precisely where the most useful insight tends to live.

The third lesson is about the relationship between patience and decisiveness. These are often presented as opposites, but in my experience they're complementary. The best wildlife photographers I've encountered are not hesitant people. They are extraordinarily patient people who, when the moment arrives, act with absolute precision and without delay. The patience and the decisiveness are the same practice, both expressions of being fully present to what is actually happening rather than to what you expect or fear.

Previous
Previous

The Problem with Playbooks- Intro Series #3

Next
Next

From Follower to Leader: The Transition No One Warns You About- Intro Series #5